PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-7.96%
Revenue decline while Technology median is -3.78%. Seth Klarman would investigate if market share loss is temporary.
-9.60%
Cost reduction while Technology median is -3.22%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive advantage potential.
-6.66%
Gross profit decline while Technology median is -3.47%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive position.
1.41%
Margin change of 1.41% versus flat Technology margins. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
-2.66%
R&D reduction while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive implications.
-100.00%
G&A reduction while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate efficiency gains.
-100.00%
Marketing expense reduction while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive implications.
-631.91%
Other expenses reduction while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
1.82%
Operating expenses change of 1.82% versus flat Technology costs. Walter Schloss would verify control.
-4.35%
Total costs reduction while Technology median is -3.05%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
3.50%
Interest expense change of 3.50% versus flat Technology costs. Walter Schloss would verify control.
0.08%
D&A change of 0.08% versus flat Technology D&A. Walter Schloss would verify adequacy.
224.77%
EBITDA growth while Technology declines. Peter Lynch would examine advantages.
-16.51%
EBITDA margin decline while Technology median is -5.14%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-23.85%
Operating income decline while Technology median is -10.92%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-17.27%
Operating margin decline while Technology median is -7.34%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-22.06%
Other expenses reduction while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
-24.51%
Pre-tax income decline while Technology median is -9.73%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-17.99%
Pre-tax margin decline while Technology median is -7.80%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
9.41%
Tax expense growth while Technology reduces burden. Peter Lynch would examine differences.
-30.62%
Net income decline while Technology median is -12.80%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-24.62%
Net margin decline while Technology median is -11.06%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-31.82%
EPS decline while Technology median is -11.90%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-31.82%
Diluted EPS decline while Technology median is -11.76%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
0.89%
Share count change of 0.89% versus stable Technology. Walter Schloss would verify approach.
2.05%
Diluted share change of 2.05% versus stable Technology. Walter Schloss would verify approach.