PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-6.85%
Revenue decline while Technology median is -2.18%. Seth Klarman would investigate if market share loss is temporary.
-9.18%
Cost reduction while Technology median is -1.52%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive advantage potential.
-5.06%
Gross profit decline while Technology median is -2.16%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive position.
1.93%
Margin change of 1.93% versus flat Technology margins. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
0.58%
R&D change of 0.58% versus flat Technology spending. Walter Schloss would verify adequacy.
-100.00%
G&A reduction while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate efficiency gains.
-100.00%
Marketing expense reduction while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive implications.
-300.00%
Other expenses reduction while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-5.02%
Total costs reduction while Technology median is -0.99%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.17%
D&A reduction while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate efficiency.
-4.49%
EBITDA decline while Technology median is -5.88%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-8.80%
EBITDA margin decline while Technology median is -4.10%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-2.78%
Operating income decline while Technology median is -8.77%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
4.37%
Operating margin growth while Technology declines. Peter Lynch would examine advantages.
37.50%
Other expenses change of 37.50% versus flat Technology. Walter Schloss would verify control.
-4.74%
Pre-tax income decline while Technology median is -6.21%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
2.26%
Pre-tax margin growth while Technology declines. Peter Lynch would examine advantages.
-2.17%
Tax expense reduction while Technology median is -3.12%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
-5.31%
Net income decline while Technology median is -6.42%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
1.65%
Net margin growth while Technology declines. Peter Lynch would examine advantages.
-5.26%
EPS decline while Technology median is -6.36%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-5.68%
Diluted EPS decline while Technology median is -6.44%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-0.37%
Share count reduction while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate strategy.
0.67%
Diluted share change of 0.67% versus stable Technology. Walter Schloss would verify approach.