PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-19.11%
Revenue decline while Technology median is 2.19%. Seth Klarman would investigate if market share loss is temporary.
32.62%
Cost growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 1.31%. Jim Chanos would check for structural cost disadvantages.
-46.33%
Gross profit decline while Technology median is 1.80%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive position.
-33.64%
Margin decline while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive position.
12.73%
R&D change of 12.73% versus flat Technology spending. Walter Schloss would verify adequacy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
61.54%
Other expenses change of 61.54% versus flat Technology costs. Walter Schloss would verify efficiency.
9.32%
Operating expenses change of 9.32% versus flat Technology costs. Walter Schloss would verify control.
22.46%
Total costs growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 1.37%. Jim Chanos would check for waste.
-4.41%
Interest expense reduction while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
13.17%
D&A growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 0.59%. Jim Chanos would check for overinvestment.
-58.41%
EBITDA decline while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-68.12%
EBITDA margin decline while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-73.29%
Operating income decline while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-66.98%
Operating margin decline while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
61.90%
Other expenses change of 61.90% versus flat Technology. Walter Schloss would verify control.
-73.68%
Pre-tax income decline while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-67.47%
Pre-tax margin decline while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-196.79%
Tax expense reduction while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
-59.46%
Net income decline while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-49.88%
Net margin decline while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-60.00%
EPS decline while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-59.38%
Diluted EPS decline while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-0.44%
Share count reduction while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate strategy.
-0.83%
Diluted share reduction while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate strategy.