PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Profitability reveals how effectively the business turns revenues into profits. Higher and improving margins or returns on capital suggest a durable competitive advantage, supporting a stronger intrinsic valuation.
-5.53%
Negative ROE while TSM stands at 4.78%. Joel Greenblatt would investigate capital misallocation or uncompetitive positioning.
-2.98%
Negative ROA while TSM stands at 3.92%. John Neff would check for structural inefficiencies or mispriced assets.
-4.23%
Negative ROCE while TSM is at 4.58%. Joel Greenblatt would look for capital misallocation or cyclical downturn.
25.14%
Gross margin 50-75% of TSM's 39.10%. Martin Whitman would worry about a persistent competitive disadvantage.
-11.64%
Negative operating margin while TSM has 30.04%. Joel Greenblatt would demand urgent improvements in cost or revenue.
-11.30%
Negative net margin while TSM has 27.67%. Joel Greenblatt would check if uncompetitive pricing or bloated costs cause losses.