PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Profitability reveals how effectively the business turns revenues into profits. Higher and improving margins or returns on capital suggest a durable competitive advantage, supporting a stronger intrinsic valuation.
-6.17%
Negative ROE while TSM stands at 6.60%. Joel Greenblatt would investigate capital misallocation or uncompetitive positioning.
-4.41%
Negative ROA while TSM stands at 5.49%. John Neff would check for structural inefficiencies or mispriced assets.
-6.81%
Negative ROCE while TSM is at 6.53%. Joel Greenblatt would look for capital misallocation or cyclical downturn.
29.44%
Gross margin 50-75% of TSM's 48.53%. Martin Whitman would worry about a persistent competitive disadvantage.
-36.39%
Negative operating margin while TSM has 36.53%. Joel Greenblatt would demand urgent improvements in cost or revenue.
-30.69%
Negative net margin while TSM has 35.47%. Joel Greenblatt would check if uncompetitive pricing or bloated costs cause losses.