176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Profitability reveals how effectively the business turns revenues into profits. Higher and improving margins or returns on capital suggest a durable competitive advantage, supporting a stronger intrinsic valuation.
-8.68%
Negative ROE while TSM stands at 6.37%. Joel Greenblatt would investigate capital misallocation or uncompetitive positioning.
-6.33%
Negative ROA while TSM stands at 5.37%. John Neff would check for structural inefficiencies or mispriced assets.
-9.33%
Negative ROCE while TSM is at 6.22%. Joel Greenblatt would look for capital misallocation or cyclical downturn.
28.56%
Gross margin 50-75% of TSM's 47.93%. Martin Whitman would worry about a persistent competitive disadvantage.
-34.77%
Negative operating margin while TSM has 37.02%. Joel Greenblatt would demand urgent improvements in cost or revenue.
-30.31%
Negative net margin while TSM has 36.52%. Joel Greenblatt would check if uncompetitive pricing or bloated costs cause losses.