10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.61M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
216.54%
Cash & equivalents growing 216.54% while DC's declined -9.94%. Peter Lynch would see this as a sign of superior liquidity management.
-100.00%
Both DC and the company show zero Short-Term Investments Growth.
-48.28%
Cash + STI yoy ≥ 1.5x DC's -9.94%. David Dodd might see it as a strategic cash buffer advantage. Evaluate deployment plans.
41.21%
Higher Net Receivables Growth compared to DC's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-41.59%
≥ 1.5x DC's -9.91%. David Dodd might see a short-term liquidity advantage or potential underutilized capital.
11.34%
Below half DC's -97.53%. Michael Burry sees potential underinvestment risk unless there's a valid reason (asset-light model).
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
11.34%
Below half of DC's -0.07%. Michael Burry might suspect stagnation or lack of resources for expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-6.11%
≥ 1.5x DC's -3.58%. David Dodd notes a larger balance sheet expansion. Confirm it's not overleveraged.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-69.06%
Higher Other Current Liabilities Growth compared to DC's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-69.06%
Less than half of DC's 60.52%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined short-term liability approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-69.06%
Less than half of DC's 47.70%. David Dodd sees far fewer liability expansions relative to competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-8.90%
1.25-1.5x DC's -8.05%. Bruce Berkowitz notes stronger reinvestment strategy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
24900904.85%
Higher Other Stockholders' Equity Items Growth compared to DC's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-2.53%
0.5-0.75x DC's -4.45%. Martin Whitman is wary of lagging equity growth vs. competitor.
-6.11%
≥ 1.5x DC's -3.58%. David Dodd sees faster overall balance sheet growth than competitor.
-100.00%
Both DC and the company show zero Total Investments Growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-216.54%
Less than half of DC's 9.96%. David Dodd sees better deleveraging or stronger cash buildup than competitor.
