10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.61M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
-85.43%
Both companies show declining cash positions (-85.43% vs DC's -9.94%). Seth Klarman would examine if this reflects broader market conditions or operational challenges.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-85.43%
Cash + STI yoy ≥ 1.5x DC's -9.94%. David Dodd might see it as a strategic cash buffer advantage. Evaluate deployment plans.
45.67%
Higher Net Receivables Growth compared to DC's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-177.86%
Higher Inventory Growth compared to DC's zero value, indicating worse performance.
140737436.00%
Other current assets growth < half of DC's -100.00%. David Dodd sees a leaner approach to short-term items.
-50.08%
≥ 1.5x DC's -9.91%. David Dodd might see a short-term liquidity advantage or potential underutilized capital.
1.25%
Below half DC's -97.53%. Michael Burry sees potential underinvestment risk unless there's a valid reason (asset-light model).
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-51.84%
Both DC and the company show zero Long-Term Investments Growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
198.18%
Less than half of DC's 19533.64%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in non-core assets. Possibly a simpler focus.
1.08%
Below half of DC's -0.07%. Michael Burry might suspect stagnation or lack of resources for expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.52%
0.5-0.75x DC's -3.58%. Martin Whitman worries about slower asset growth than competitor. Is it strategy or constraint?
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
10.24%
Higher Other Current Liabilities Growth compared to DC's zero value, indicating worse performance.
10.24%
Less than half of DC's 60.52%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined short-term liability approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
10.24%
Less than half of DC's 47.70%. David Dodd sees far fewer liability expansions relative to competitor.
-3.67%
Less than half of DC's 0.34%. David Dodd sees fewer share issuances vs. competitor.
-1.71%
Below half DC's -8.05%. Michael Burry suspects major net losses or high dividends vs. competitor.
-15.35%
Higher AOCI Growth compared to DC's zero value, indicating worse performance.
110.69%
Higher Other Stockholders' Equity Items Growth compared to DC's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-10.93%
≥ 1.5x DC's -4.45%. David Dodd sees stronger capital base growth than competitor.
-2.52%
0.5-0.75x DC's -3.58%. Martin Whitman sees underexpansion or possible missed opportunities.
-51.84%
Both DC and the company show zero Total Investments Growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
85.43%
Above 1.5x DC's 9.96%. Michael Burry sees a major gap in net debt growth. Check coverage and liquidity.
