10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.61M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
101.84%
Cash & equivalents growing 101.84% while DC's declined -9.94%. Peter Lynch would see this as a sign of superior liquidity management.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
101.84%
Below half of DC's -9.94%. Michael Burry might suspect a liquidity shortfall if there's no alternative capital plan.
-100.00%
Higher Net Receivables Growth compared to DC's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-100.00%
Higher Inventory Growth compared to DC's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-100.00%
Similar to DC's -100.00%. Walter Schloss would confirm standard short-term asset patterns.
102.80%
Below half of DC's -9.91%. Michael Burry could suspect a liquidity squeeze. Verify operational performance.
-14.74%
Below half DC's -97.53%. Michael Burry sees potential underinvestment risk unless there's a valid reason (asset-light model).
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-4.42%
Both DC and the company show zero Long-Term Investments Growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
128.69%
Less than half of DC's 19533.64%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in non-core assets. Possibly a simpler focus.
-14.73%
≥ 1.5x DC's -0.07%. David Dodd sees significantly higher long-term asset buildup. Confirm synergy with strategy.
-83.46%
Higher Other Assets Growth compared to DC's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-10.32%
≥ 1.5x DC's -3.58%. David Dodd notes a larger balance sheet expansion. Confirm it's not overleveraged.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Higher Other Current Liabilities Growth compared to DC's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-54.40%
Less than half of DC's 60.52%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined short-term liability approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-54.40%
Less than half of DC's 47.70%. David Dodd sees far fewer liability expansions relative to competitor.
4.39%
Above 1.5x DC's 0.34%. Michael Burry suspects heavy new equity expansion or dilution.
-3.82%
Below half DC's -8.05%. Michael Burry suspects major net losses or high dividends vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
72.32%
Higher Other Stockholders' Equity Items Growth compared to DC's zero value, indicating worse performance.
25.31%
Below half DC's -4.45%. Michael Burry sees potential underperformance in building shareholder capital.
-10.32%
≥ 1.5x DC's -3.58%. David Dodd sees faster overall balance sheet growth than competitor.
-4.42%
Both DC and the company show zero Total Investments Growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-88.60%
Less than half of DC's 9.96%. David Dodd sees better deleveraging or stronger cash buildup than competitor.
