10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.61M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
-40.97%
Both companies show declining cash positions (-40.97% vs DC's -9.94%). Seth Klarman would examine if this reflects broader market conditions or operational challenges.
100.00%
Higher Short-Term Investments Growth compared to DC's zero value, indicating better performance.
-40.89%
Cash + STI yoy ≥ 1.5x DC's -9.94%. David Dodd might see it as a strategic cash buffer advantage. Evaluate deployment plans.
-100.00%
Higher Net Receivables Growth compared to DC's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-40.70%
≥ 1.5x DC's -9.91%. David Dodd might see a short-term liquidity advantage or potential underutilized capital.
0.40%
Below half DC's -97.53%. Michael Burry sees potential underinvestment risk unless there's a valid reason (asset-light model).
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
52.82%
Less than half of DC's 19533.64%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in non-core assets. Possibly a simpler focus.
0.72%
Below half of DC's -0.07%. Michael Burry might suspect stagnation or lack of resources for expansions.
100.00%
Higher Other Assets Growth compared to DC's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-2.94%
0.75-0.9x DC's -3.58%. Bill Ackman questions if competitor invests more aggressively for growth.
-55.75%
Less than half of DC's 260.12%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined AP approach or lower volume.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Higher Other Current Liabilities Growth compared to DC's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-27.63%
Less than half of DC's 60.52%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined short-term liability approach.
50.98%
Higher Long-Term Debt Growth compared to DC's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-12.18%
Higher Other Non-Current Liabilities Growth compared to DC's zero value, indicating worse performance.
43.23%
Less than half of DC's -6.81%. David Dodd sees a more conservative approach to non-current liabilities.
100.00%
Higher Other Liabilities Growth compared to DC's zero value, indicating worse performance.
18.84%
Less than half of DC's 47.70%. David Dodd sees far fewer liability expansions relative to competitor.
-2.01%
Less than half of DC's 0.34%. David Dodd sees fewer share issuances vs. competitor.
-59.50%
≥ 1.5x DC's -8.05%. David Dodd sees higher yoy retained profits than competitor.
32.91%
Higher AOCI Growth compared to DC's zero value, indicating worse performance.
7.80%
Higher Other Stockholders' Equity Items Growth compared to DC's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-4.45%
Similar yoy to DC's -4.45%. Walter Schloss sees parallel net worth trends.
-3.09%
0.75-0.9x DC's -3.58%. Bill Ackman wonders if competitor invests or leverages more aggressively.
100.00%
Higher Total Investments Growth compared to DC's zero value, indicating better performance.
50.78%
Less than half of DC's -7.47%. David Dodd sees less overall debt expansion vs. competitor.
93.88%
Above 1.5x DC's 9.96%. Michael Burry sees a major gap in net debt growth. Check coverage and liquidity.
