10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.61M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
22.06%
Cash & equivalents growing 22.06% while DC's declined -40.87%. Peter Lynch would see this as a sign of superior liquidity management.
100.00%
Higher Short-Term Investments Growth compared to DC's zero value, indicating better performance.
22.68%
Below half of DC's -40.87%. Michael Burry might suspect a liquidity shortfall if there's no alternative capital plan.
3007.54%
Higher Net Receivables Growth compared to DC's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-2.20%
Higher Inventory Growth compared to DC's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-100.00%
Other current assets growth < half of DC's 129.76%. David Dodd sees a leaner approach to short-term items.
14.43%
Below half of DC's -38.09%. Michael Burry could suspect a liquidity squeeze. Verify operational performance.
-44.59%
Below half DC's 3.57%. Michael Burry sees potential underinvestment risk unless there's a valid reason (asset-light model).
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.51%
Higher Long-Term Investments Growth compared to DC's zero value, indicating better performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2158.22%
Less than half of DC's -28.75%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in non-core assets. Possibly a simpler focus.
-0.05%
Below half of DC's 2.17%. Michael Burry might suspect stagnation or lack of resources for expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3.88%
Below half of DC's -7.41%. Michael Burry sees a potential red flag for stagnation or capital shortage.
2.77%
Higher Accounts Payable Growth compared to DC's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-62.61%
Higher Tax Payables Growth compared to DC's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-26.57%
Both DC and the company show zero Deferred Revenue (Current) Growth.
22.03%
Less than half of DC's -53.76%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in other current obligations.
-22.92%
Above 1.5x DC's -13.99%. Michael Burry sees a red flag for liquidity risk vs. competitor.
-0.10%
Higher Long-Term Debt Growth compared to DC's zero value, indicating worse performance.
1.90%
Higher Non-Current Deferred Revenue Growth compared to DC's zero value, indicating better performance.
912.02%
Less than half of DC's -93.68%. David Dodd sees fewer additions to deferred tax liabilities vs. competitor.
30.79%
Less than half of DC's -100.00%. David Dodd notes more conservative expansions in non-current obligations.
2.76%
Less than half of DC's -88.74%. David Dodd sees a more conservative approach to non-current liabilities.
100.00%
Higher Other Liabilities Growth compared to DC's zero value, indicating worse performance.
2.63%
Less than half of DC's -28.79%. David Dodd sees far fewer liability expansions relative to competitor.
0.51%
Less than half of DC's 1.11%. David Dodd sees fewer share issuances vs. competitor.
17.97%
Below half DC's -20.14%. Michael Burry suspects major net losses or high dividends vs. competitor.
-0.91%
Higher AOCI Growth compared to DC's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-100.00%
Similar yoy changes to DC's -100.00%. Walter Schloss finds parallel equity item fluctuations.
4.30%
Below half DC's -6.25%. Michael Burry sees potential underperformance in building shareholder capital.
3.88%
Below half DC's -7.41%. Michael Burry sees significant shrinkage or inactivity vs. competitor.
0.51%
Higher Total Investments Growth compared to DC's zero value, indicating better performance.
-0.37%
Less than half of DC's -15.64%. David Dodd sees less overall debt expansion vs. competitor.
-402.81%
Less than half of DC's 41.09%. David Dodd sees better deleveraging or stronger cash buildup than competitor.
