10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.61M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
-43.11%
Both companies show declining cash positions (-43.11% vs FURY's -0.53%). Seth Klarman would examine if this reflects broader market conditions or operational challenges.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-43.11%
Cash + STI yoy ≥ 1.5x FURY's -0.53%. David Dodd might see it as a strategic cash buffer advantage. Evaluate deployment plans.
-100.00%
Similar receivables growth to FURY's -100.00%. Walter Schloss would see comparable credit policies, investigating any subtle differences in sales.
-100.00%
Higher Inventory Growth compared to FURY's zero value, indicating worse performance.
597.87%
Higher Other Current Assets Growth compared to FURY's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-47.46%
≥ 1.5x FURY's -0.84%. David Dodd might see a short-term liquidity advantage or potential underutilized capital.
0.49%
Higher PP&E (Net) Growth compared to FURY's zero value, indicating better performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-56.54%
Both FURY and the company show zero Long-Term Investments Growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
164.20%
Higher Other Non-Current Assets Growth compared to FURY's zero value, indicating worse performance.
0.06%
Higher Total Non-Current Assets Growth compared to FURY's zero value, indicating better performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-5.69%
≥ 1.5x FURY's -0.84%. David Dodd notes a larger balance sheet expansion. Confirm it's not overleveraged.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-24.40%
Higher Other Current Liabilities Growth compared to FURY's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-24.40%
Less than half of FURY's 741.80%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined short-term liability approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-24.40%
Less than half of FURY's 741.80%. David Dodd sees far fewer liability expansions relative to competitor.
-0.16%
Higher Common Stock (Book Value) Growth compared to FURY's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-5.25%
1.25-1.5x FURY's -3.58%. Bruce Berkowitz notes stronger reinvestment strategy.
100.00%
Higher AOCI Growth compared to FURY's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-1.80%
Above 1.5x FURY's -0.72%. Michael Burry suspects a significant bump in 'other' equity items vs. competitor.
-3.58%
Similar yoy to FURY's -3.29%. Walter Schloss sees parallel net worth trends.
-5.69%
≥ 1.5x FURY's -0.84%. David Dodd sees faster overall balance sheet growth than competitor.
-56.54%
Both FURY and the company show zero Total Investments Growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
43.11%
Above 1.5x FURY's 0.53%. Michael Burry sees a major gap in net debt growth. Check coverage and liquidity.
