10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.61M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
-85.43%
Cash & equivalents declining -85.43% while FURY's grows 3.55%. Howard Marks would question why our liquidity is shrinking while competitor builds cash.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-85.43%
Below half of FURY's 3.55%. Michael Burry might suspect a liquidity shortfall if there's no alternative capital plan.
45.67%
Higher Net Receivables Growth compared to FURY's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-177.86%
Higher Inventory Growth compared to FURY's zero value, indicating worse performance.
140737436.00%
Higher Other Current Assets Growth compared to FURY's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-50.08%
Below half of FURY's 4.39%. Michael Burry could suspect a liquidity squeeze. Verify operational performance.
1.25%
Higher PP&E (Net) Growth compared to FURY's zero value, indicating better performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-51.84%
Both FURY and the company show zero Long-Term Investments Growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
198.18%
Higher Other Non-Current Assets Growth compared to FURY's zero value, indicating worse performance.
1.08%
Higher Total Non-Current Assets Growth compared to FURY's zero value, indicating better performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.52%
Below half of FURY's 4.39%. Michael Burry sees a potential red flag for stagnation or capital shortage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
10.24%
Higher Other Current Liabilities Growth compared to FURY's zero value, indicating worse performance.
10.24%
Less than half of FURY's 40.56%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined short-term liability approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
10.24%
Less than half of FURY's 40.56%. David Dodd sees far fewer liability expansions relative to competitor.
-3.67%
Less than half of FURY's 11.55%. David Dodd sees fewer share issuances vs. competitor.
-1.71%
Below half FURY's -35.30%. Michael Burry suspects major net losses or high dividends vs. competitor.
-15.35%
Higher AOCI Growth compared to FURY's zero value, indicating worse performance.
110.69%
Less than half of FURY's -28013.63%. David Dodd notes simpler yoy equity changes vs. competitor.
-10.93%
Below half FURY's 3.29%. Michael Burry sees potential underperformance in building shareholder capital.
-2.52%
Below half FURY's 4.39%. Michael Burry sees significant shrinkage or inactivity vs. competitor.
-51.84%
Both FURY and the company show zero Total Investments Growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
85.43%
Less than half of FURY's -3.55%. David Dodd sees better deleveraging or stronger cash buildup than competitor.
