10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.61M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
391.82%
Cash & equivalents growing 391.82% while ITRG's declined -1.70%. Peter Lynch would see this as a sign of superior liquidity management.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
391.82%
Cash + STI yoy ≥ 1.5x ITRG's 75.82%. David Dodd might see it as a strategic cash buffer advantage. Evaluate deployment plans.
-61.71%
Receivables growth 1.25-1.5x ITRG's -41.36%. Martin Whitman would worry that the company may be booking revenue too aggressively.
-100.00%
Higher Inventory Growth compared to ITRG's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-100.00%
Higher Other Current Assets Growth compared to ITRG's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-3.82%
Below half of ITRG's 49.09%. Michael Burry could suspect a liquidity squeeze. Verify operational performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Similar yoy growth to ITRG's -100.00%. Walter Schloss sees parallel investment expansions. Compare portfolio quality.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
19.54%
Below half of ITRG's -8.49%. Michael Burry might suspect stagnation or lack of resources for expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-3.10%
0.5-0.75x ITRG's -6.20%. Martin Whitman worries about slower asset growth than competitor. Is it strategy or constraint?
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
160.28%
Higher Other Current Liabilities Growth compared to ITRG's zero value, indicating worse performance.
160.28%
Less than half of ITRG's -59.36%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined short-term liability approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
160.28%
Less than half of ITRG's -30.87%. David Dodd sees far fewer liability expansions relative to competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-22.19%
≥ 1.5x ITRG's -7.66%. David Dodd sees higher yoy retained profits than competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
323.40%
Less than half of ITRG's -100.00%. David Dodd notes simpler yoy equity changes vs. competitor.
-8.83%
≥ 1.5x ITRG's -4.28%. David Dodd sees stronger capital base growth than competitor.
-3.10%
0.5-0.75x ITRG's -6.20%. Martin Whitman sees underexpansion or possible missed opportunities.
-100.00%
≥ 1.5x ITRG's -43.60%. David Dodd sees far stronger investment expansions than competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-391.82%
Less than half of ITRG's 1.70%. David Dodd sees better deleveraging or stronger cash buildup than competitor.
