10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.61M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
-16.36%
Cash & equivalents declining -16.36% while ITRG's grows 85.11%. Howard Marks would question why our liquidity is shrinking while competitor builds cash.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-16.36%
Below half of ITRG's 85.11%. Michael Burry might suspect a liquidity shortfall if there's no alternative capital plan.
-60.14%
Receivables growth 50-75% of ITRG's -100.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would note relatively tighter receivables. Check if sales remain robust.
-29.13%
Inventory growth below half of ITRG's -12131564500.00%. David Dodd would check if that's due to efficiency or supply constraints.
29.13%
Other current assets growth < half of ITRG's -55.14%. David Dodd sees a leaner approach to short-term items.
-15.58%
Below half of ITRG's 77.29%. Michael Burry could suspect a liquidity squeeze. Verify operational performance.
2.65%
Higher PP&E (Net) Growth compared to ITRG's zero value, indicating better performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.67%
Higher Other Non-Current Assets Growth compared to ITRG's zero value, indicating worse performance.
2.64%
Higher Total Non-Current Assets Growth compared to ITRG's zero value, indicating better performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.00%
Below half of ITRG's 172.72%. Michael Burry sees a potential red flag for stagnation or capital shortage.
-22.21%
Less than half of ITRG's 2120.14%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined AP approach or lower volume.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
6.15%
Less than half of ITRG's 274.03%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in other current obligations.
-13.46%
Less than half of ITRG's 1183.67%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined short-term liability approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-13.46%
Less than half of ITRG's 1183.67%. David Dodd sees far fewer liability expansions relative to competitor.
4.99%
Less than half of ITRG's 10.99%. David Dodd sees fewer share issuances vs. competitor.
-23.34%
≥ 1.5x ITRG's -6.55%. David Dodd sees higher yoy retained profits than competitor.
-13.00%
Less than half of ITRG's -40.85%. David Dodd sees fewer intangible or market-driven swings than competitor.
-1.22%
Less than half of ITRG's -91.24%. David Dodd notes simpler yoy equity changes vs. competitor.
0.18%
Below half ITRG's 93.15%. Michael Burry sees potential underperformance in building shareholder capital.
-0.00%
Below half ITRG's 172.72%. Michael Burry sees significant shrinkage or inactivity vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
16.36%
Less than half of ITRG's -85.11%. David Dodd sees better deleveraging or stronger cash buildup than competitor.
