10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.61M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
-20.14%
Both companies show declining cash positions (-20.14% vs OR's -27.27%). Seth Klarman would examine if this reflects broader market conditions or operational challenges.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-20.14%
Cash + STI yoy 0.5-0.75x OR's -27.66%. Martin Whitman would worry about lagging short-term reserves. Confirm debt coverage.
-100.00%
Receivables growth above 1.5x OR's -32.48%. Michael Burry would check for potential credit bubble or inflated top-line.
100.00%
Inventory growth below half of OR's -27.48%. David Dodd would check if that's due to efficiency or supply constraints.
-68.37%
Other current assets growth < half of OR's 5575.73%. David Dodd sees a leaner approach to short-term items.
-19.80%
Below half of OR's 47.64%. Michael Burry could suspect a liquidity squeeze. Verify operational performance.
5.80%
≥ 1.5x OR's 0.06%. David Dodd sees more aggressive capex. Confirm it's not overspending.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.16%
Less than half of OR's -8.29%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in non-core assets. Possibly a simpler focus.
5.80%
Below half of OR's -5.14%. Michael Burry might suspect stagnation or lack of resources for expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.41%
Below half of OR's -0.69%. Michael Burry sees a potential red flag for stagnation or capital shortage.
-36.47%
Less than half of OR's 6.09%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined AP approach or lower volume.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3.07%
Exceeding 1.5x OR's 0.03%. Michael Burry suspects ballooning short-term obligations vs. competitor.
7.05%
Less than half of OR's -9.49%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined short-term liability approach.
90.44%
Above 1.5x OR's 0.11%. Michael Burry suspects significant leverage additions. Check coverage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
90.44%
Above 1.5x OR's 0.27%. Michael Burry sees a strong spike vs. competitor. Check coverage and debt ratios.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
53.62%
Less than half of OR's -0.19%. David Dodd sees far fewer liability expansions relative to competitor.
1.79%
Above 1.5x OR's 0.03%. Michael Burry suspects heavy new equity expansion or dilution.
-10.77%
≥ 1.5x OR's -1.24%. David Dodd sees higher yoy retained profits than competitor.
6.11%
Less than half of OR's -174.18%. David Dodd sees fewer intangible or market-driven swings than competitor.
-1.92%
Higher Other Stockholders' Equity Items Growth compared to OR's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-0.55%
0.5-0.75x OR's -0.84%. Martin Whitman is wary of lagging equity growth vs. competitor.
2.41%
Below half OR's -0.69%. Michael Burry sees significant shrinkage or inactivity vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
90.44%
Above 1.5x OR's 0.11%. Michael Burry sees a major jump. Investigate leverage rationale.
32.08%
1.25-1.5x OR's 22.50%. Martin Whitman is wary of heavier net leverage vs. competitor.
