10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.61M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
-5.82%
Both companies show declining cash positions (-5.82% vs THM's -16.17%). Seth Klarman would examine if this reflects broader market conditions or operational challenges.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-5.82%
Below half of THM's -16.22%. Michael Burry might suspect a liquidity shortfall if there's no alternative capital plan.
-21.98%
Receivables growth less than half of THM's 125.42%. David Dodd might see more conservative credit practices, provided revenue isn't suffering.
100.16%
Higher Inventory Growth compared to THM's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-100.00%
Higher Other Current Assets Growth compared to THM's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-14.75%
0.75-0.9x THM's -18.28%. Bill Ackman would ask if competitor is building short-term resources more aggressively.
-50.53%
≥ 1.5x THM's -0.01%. David Dodd sees more aggressive capex. Confirm it's not overspending.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-3.12%
Both THM and the company show zero Long-Term Investments Growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
56.06%
Higher Other Non-Current Assets Growth compared to THM's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-50.45%
Below half of THM's 0.05%. Michael Burry might suspect stagnation or lack of resources for expansions.
100.00%
Higher Other Assets Growth compared to THM's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-48.88%
≥ 1.5x THM's -4.34%. David Dodd notes a larger balance sheet expansion. Confirm it's not overleveraged.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
86.93%
Higher Other Current Liabilities Growth compared to THM's zero value, indicating worse performance.
86.93%
Above 1.5x THM's 31.00%. Michael Burry sees a red flag for liquidity risk vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
86.93%
Less than half of THM's -8.67%. David Dodd sees far fewer liability expansions relative to competitor.
-3.12%
Higher Common Stock (Book Value) Growth compared to THM's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-72.33%
≥ 1.5x THM's -0.47%. David Dodd sees higher yoy retained profits than competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4.43%
Higher Other Stockholders' Equity Items Growth compared to THM's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-65.43%
≥ 1.5x THM's -2.93%. David Dodd sees stronger capital base growth than competitor.
-48.88%
≥ 1.5x THM's -4.34%. David Dodd sees faster overall balance sheet growth than competitor.
-3.12%
Below half THM's -27.48%. Michael Burry suspects major underinvestment or forced divestment.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
5.82%
Less than half of THM's 16.17%. David Dodd sees better deleveraging or stronger cash buildup than competitor.
