10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.61M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
-5.05%
Both companies show declining cash positions (-5.05% vs THM's -15.62%). Seth Klarman would examine if this reflects broader market conditions or operational challenges.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-5.05%
Below half of THM's -15.62%. Michael Burry might suspect a liquidity shortfall if there's no alternative capital plan.
-62.71%
Higher Net Receivables Growth compared to THM's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
8511911555336439.00%
Higher Other Current Assets Growth compared to THM's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-5.31%
Below half of THM's -13.58%. Michael Burry could suspect a liquidity squeeze. Verify operational performance.
2.13%
Below half THM's -0.00%. Michael Burry sees potential underinvestment risk unless there's a valid reason (asset-light model).
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.13%
Higher Long-Term Investments Growth compared to THM's zero value, indicating better performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
72.14%
Higher Other Non-Current Assets Growth compared to THM's zero value, indicating worse performance.
2.13%
Below half of THM's -0.00%. Michael Burry might suspect stagnation or lack of resources for expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.38%
0.5-0.75x THM's -2.34%. Martin Whitman worries about slower asset growth than competitor. Is it strategy or constraint?
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-20.58%
Higher Other Current Liabilities Growth compared to THM's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-20.58%
Less than half of THM's 23.42%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined short-term liability approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-20.58%
Less than half of THM's 1.38%. David Dodd sees far fewer liability expansions relative to competitor.
7.91%
Higher Common Stock (Book Value) Growth compared to THM's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-0.63%
0.5-0.75x THM's -0.90%. Martin Whitman is wary of weaker retention or lower profitability.
-16.55%
Less than half of THM's 16.43%. David Dodd sees fewer intangible or market-driven swings than competitor.
-22.91%
Higher Other Stockholders' Equity Items Growth compared to THM's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-20.39%
≥ 1.5x THM's -3.41%. David Dodd sees stronger capital base growth than competitor.
-1.38%
0.5-0.75x THM's -2.34%. Martin Whitman sees underexpansion or possible missed opportunities.
2.13%
Higher Total Investments Growth compared to THM's zero value, indicating better performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
5.05%
Less than half of THM's 15.62%. David Dodd sees better deleveraging or stronger cash buildup than competitor.
