10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.61M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
-0.65%
Both companies show declining cash positions (-0.65% vs THM's -12.71%). Seth Klarman would examine if this reflects broader market conditions or operational challenges.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.65%
Below half of THM's -12.71%. Michael Burry might suspect a liquidity shortfall if there's no alternative capital plan.
6.85%
Higher Net Receivables Growth compared to THM's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-31.25%
Higher Other Current Assets Growth compared to THM's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-1.16%
Below half of THM's -13.19%. Michael Burry could suspect a liquidity squeeze. Verify operational performance.
8.52%
Higher PP&E (Net) Growth compared to THM's zero value, indicating better performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
12.00%
Higher Other Non-Current Assets Growth compared to THM's zero value, indicating worse performance.
8.78%
Higher Total Non-Current Assets Growth compared to THM's zero value, indicating better performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
7.21%
Below half of THM's -2.16%. Michael Burry sees a potential red flag for stagnation or capital shortage.
-45.88%
Less than half of THM's 68.12%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined AP approach or lower volume.
1.06%
Higher Short-Term Debt Growth compared to THM's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.73%
Less than half of THM's 64.49%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined short-term liability approach.
0.79%
Higher Long-Term Debt Growth compared to THM's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
46.69%
Similar yoy changes to THM's 59.97%. Walter Schloss sees parallel expansions in other LT liabilities.
1.74%
Less than half of THM's 59.97%. David Dodd sees a more conservative approach to non-current liabilities.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.59%
Less than half of THM's 64.49%. David Dodd sees far fewer liability expansions relative to competitor.
14.50%
Higher Common Stock (Book Value) Growth compared to THM's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-9.37%
≥ 1.5x THM's -0.63%. David Dodd sees higher yoy retained profits than competitor.
-7.05%
50-75% of THM's -12.23%. Bruce Berkowitz notes relatively lower AOCI expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
13.29%
Below half THM's -2.85%. Michael Burry sees potential underperformance in building shareholder capital.
7.21%
Below half THM's -2.16%. Michael Burry sees significant shrinkage or inactivity vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.78%
Higher Total Debt Growth compared to THM's zero value, indicating worse performance.
1.45%
Less than half of THM's 12.71%. David Dodd sees better deleveraging or stronger cash buildup than competitor.
