10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.61M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
8.00%
Cash & equivalents growing 8.00% while THM's declined -11.43%. Peter Lynch would see this as a sign of superior liquidity management.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
8.00%
Below half of THM's -11.43%. Michael Burry might suspect a liquidity shortfall if there's no alternative capital plan.
58.40%
Higher Net Receivables Growth compared to THM's zero value, indicating worse performance.
22.95%
Higher Inventory Growth compared to THM's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
12.94%
Below half of THM's -11.34%. Michael Burry could suspect a liquidity squeeze. Verify operational performance.
1.85%
Higher PP&E (Net) Growth compared to THM's zero value, indicating better performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-9.52%
Higher Other Non-Current Assets Growth compared to THM's zero value, indicating worse performance.
1.48%
Higher Total Non-Current Assets Growth compared to THM's zero value, indicating better performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3.76%
Below half of THM's -1.05%. Michael Burry sees a potential red flag for stagnation or capital shortage.
103.61%
50-75% of THM's 138.36%. Bruce Berkowitz notes the company is paying suppliers faster or not stretching terms as competitor does.
52.00%
Higher Short-Term Debt Growth compared to THM's zero value, indicating worse performance.
40.09%
Higher Tax Payables Growth compared to THM's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.15%
Higher Other Current Liabilities Growth compared to THM's zero value, indicating worse performance.
25.88%
Less than half of THM's 60.61%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined short-term liability approach.
-22.13%
Higher Long-Term Debt Growth compared to THM's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4.05%
Higher Other Non-Current Liabilities Growth compared to THM's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-14.78%
Higher Total Non-Current Liabilities Growth compared to THM's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.25%
Less than half of THM's 60.61%. David Dodd sees far fewer liability expansions relative to competitor.
1.52%
Higher Common Stock (Book Value) Growth compared to THM's zero value, indicating worse performance.
20.89%
Below half THM's -0.31%. Michael Burry suspects major net losses or high dividends vs. competitor.
-10.35%
Less than half of THM's 4.39%. David Dodd sees fewer intangible or market-driven swings than competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
6.09%
Below half THM's -1.23%. Michael Burry sees potential underperformance in building shareholder capital.
3.76%
Below half THM's -1.05%. Michael Burry sees significant shrinkage or inactivity vs. competitor.
-82.25%
Both THM and the company show zero Total Investments Growth.
-13.89%
Higher Total Debt Growth compared to THM's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-47.50%
Less than half of THM's 11.43%. David Dodd sees better deleveraging or stronger cash buildup than competitor.
