PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Orla Mining Ltd. (ORLA)
11.070.67 (6.44%)
10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.61M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
1589.95%
Some net income increase while CGAU is negative at -1178.86%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
Lower deferred tax growth vs. CGAU's 909.23%, implying fewer future tax liabilities. David Dodd would confirm there’s no short-term tax shock instead.
-25.20%
Both cut yoy SBC, with CGAU at -453.89%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
-205.46%
Both reduce yoy usage, with CGAU at -138.23%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
-200.85%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with CGAU at -109.37%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
33.68%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. CGAU's 163.99%, indicating lean supply management. David Dodd would confirm no demand shortfall.
214.57%
AP growth well above CGAU's 76.94%. Michael Burry would be concerned about potential late payments or short-term liquidity strain relative to competitor.
-100.39%
Negative yoy usage while CGAU is 80.59%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
-67.42%
Negative yoy while CGAU is 85.21%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
15.60%
Some CFO growth while CGAU is negative at -388.60%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-43.84%
Negative yoy CapEx while CGAU is 33.22%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-227.26%
Negative yoy purchasing while CGAU stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
-193.06%
We reduce yoy sales while CGAU is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
-46.90%
We reduce yoy other investing while CGAU is 102.87%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-75.04%
We reduce yoy invests while CGAU stands at 32.93%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
99.06%
Debt repayment above 1.5x CGAU's 6.94%, indicating stronger deleveraging. David Dodd would verify if expansions are not neglected.
-100.00%
Both yoy lines negative, with CGAU at -60.00%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment or preference for internal financing over new equity in the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.