PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.61M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
110.12%
Some net income increase while CGAU is negative at -283.99%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
-100.00%
Negative yoy D&A while CGAU is 24.17%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.54%
Less SBC growth vs. CGAU's 164.98%, indicating lower equity issuance. David Dodd would confirm the firm still retains key staff.
-965.20%
Both reduce yoy usage, with CGAU at -55.26%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
408.26%
AR growth while CGAU is negative at -185.30%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
144.37%
Some inventory rise while CGAU is negative at -1706.43%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
76.31%
Lower AP growth vs. CGAU's 943.81%, indicating prompt payments. David Dodd would confirm no lost opportunity in interest-free credit if expansions are underfunded.
-131113.04%
Both reduce yoy usage, with CGAU at -402.40%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
327.94%
Lower 'other non-cash' growth vs. CGAU's 1591.55%, indicating steadier reported figures. David Dodd would confirm no missed necessary write-downs or gains.
38.14%
Operating cash flow growth similar to CGAU's 42.12%. Walter Schloss would see parallel improvements or market conditions in cash generation.
-381.56%
Negative yoy CapEx while CGAU is 16.38%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
100.00%
Some acquisitions while CGAU is negative at -71.04%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pausing M&A or divesting while the firm invests in new deals.
202.09%
Purchases growth of 202.09% while CGAU is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
6873.76%
Liquidation growth of 6873.76% while CGAU is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
-381.98%
We reduce yoy other investing while CGAU is 71.04%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-1020.15%
We reduce yoy invests while CGAU stands at 16.38%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
118288.35%
We repay more while CGAU is negative at -3.39%. John Neff notes advantage in lowering leverage if competitor is ramping up debt or repaying less.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
Repurchase growth 1.25-1.5x CGAU's 88.04%. Bruce Berkowitz would confirm if the firm invests enough in expansions while boosting EPS.