PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Orla Mining Ltd. (ORLA)
11.070.67 (6.44%)
10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.60M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
169.04%
Net income growth above 1.5x FURY's 33.27%. David Dodd would see a clear bottom-line advantage if it is backed by stable operations.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-52.35%
Negative yoy SBC while FURY is 3.85%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
-176.79%
Both reduce yoy usage, with FURY at -157.46%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
-96.76%
AR is negative yoy while FURY is 56.90%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
-147.75%
Negative yoy inventory while FURY is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-204.49%
Both reduce yoy usage, with FURY at -74.08%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
-102.63%
Both negative yoy, with FURY at -532.11%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
-76.96%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with FURY at -77.62%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
99.67%
Some CapEx rise while FURY is negative at -1823.40%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-342.87%
Both yoy lines negative, with FURY at -29.55%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
96.24%
Lower net investing outflow yoy vs. FURY's 112266.67%, preserving short-term cash. David Dodd would confirm expansions remain sufficient.
-106.76%
We cut debt repayment yoy while FURY is 70.83%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
-32.80%
Negative yoy issuance while FURY is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.