PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Orla Mining Ltd. (ORLA)
11.070.67 (6.44%)
10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.61M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-32.57%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with FURY at -71.27%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
-82.55%
Negative yoy D&A while FURY is 1.54%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
75.00%
Deferred tax of 75.00% while FURY is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a partial difference that can matter for future cash flow if large in magnitude.
-60.16%
Negative yoy SBC while FURY is 3.42%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
90.71%
Less working capital growth vs. FURY's 1305.41%, indicating potentially more efficient day-to-day cash usage. David Dodd would confirm no negative impact on revenue.
-94.18%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with FURY at -350.68%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
91.31%
Lower 'other working capital' growth vs. FURY's 926.63%. David Dodd would see fewer unexpected short-term demands on cash.
-731.52%
Both negative yoy, with FURY at -221.53%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
-62.25%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with FURY at -60.23%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
-215.65%
Negative yoy CapEx while FURY is 88.17%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-4.00%
We reduce yoy other investing while FURY is 263.16%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-41.95%
We reduce yoy invests while FURY stands at 91.24%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Negative yoy issuance while FURY is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.