PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Orla Mining Ltd. (ORLA)
11.070.67 (6.44%)
10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.61M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-87.61%
Negative net income growth while FURY stands at 10.81%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
3737.67%
Some D&A expansion while FURY is negative at -1.59%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
1610612735999900.00%
Deferred tax of 1610612735999900.00% while FURY is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a partial difference that can matter for future cash flow if large in magnitude.
97.10%
SBC growth while FURY is negative at -42.55%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
74.09%
Slight usage while FURY is negative at -80.55%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
562.83%
AR growth while FURY is negative at -118.18%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
72.92%
Some yoy usage while FURY is negative at -34.65%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
-76.79%
Negative yoy while FURY is 34.29%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
-100.49%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with FURY at -3.91%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
-10536.45%
Negative yoy CapEx while FURY is 99.15%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
37.52%
Less 'other investing' outflow yoy vs. FURY's 255.56%. David Dodd would see a stronger short-term cash position unless competitor invests more wisely.
-168.08%
We reduce yoy invests while FURY stands at 128.44%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
Lower share issuance yoy vs. FURY's 213000.00%, implying less dilution. David Dodd would confirm the firm still has enough capital for expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.