PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Orla Mining Ltd. (ORLA)
11.070.67 (6.44%)
10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.61M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
110.12%
Net income growth 1.25-1.5x FURY's 76.62%. Bruce Berkowitz would verify whether cost discipline or revenue gains drive the outperformance.
-100.00%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with FURY at -45.00%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.54%
SBC growth while FURY is negative at -34.76%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
-965.20%
Negative yoy working capital usage while FURY is 6.10%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
408.26%
AR growth well above FURY's 131.46%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
144.37%
Inventory growth of 144.37% while FURY is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate build that must match future sales to avoid risk.
76.31%
AP growth of 76.31% while FURY is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might matter for short-term liquidity if expansions are large.
-131113.04%
Both reduce yoy usage, with FURY at -28.66%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
327.94%
Some yoy increase while FURY is negative at -97.22%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
38.14%
Operating cash flow growth at 75-90% of FURY's 45.65%. Bill Ackman would recommend further refinements to match competitor’s CFO gains.
-381.56%
Negative yoy CapEx while FURY is 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
100.00%
Less M&A spending yoy vs. FURY's 628.81%, reducing near-term risk. David Dodd would confirm the firm is not missing out on a strategic deal that competitor might exploit.
202.09%
Purchases growth of 202.09% while FURY is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
6873.76%
Liquidation growth of 6873.76% while FURY is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
-381.98%
Both yoy lines negative, with FURY at -67.58%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
-1020.15%
We reduce yoy invests while FURY stands at 693.99%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
118288.35%
We repay more while FURY is negative at -42.31%. John Neff notes advantage in lowering leverage if competitor is ramping up debt or repaying less.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
Buyback growth of 100.00% while FURY is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.