PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Orla Mining Ltd. (ORLA)
11.070.67 (6.44%)
10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.61M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
129.11%
Net income growth above 1.5x FURY's 79.73%. David Dodd would see a clear bottom-line advantage if it is backed by stable operations.
0.97%
Some D&A expansion while FURY is negative at -1.18%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
-67.99%
Negative yoy deferred tax while FURY stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
679.93%
SBC growth well above FURY's 8.12%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
445.84%
Well above FURY's 124.55% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
146.96%
AR growth of 146.96% while FURY is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a mild difference in credit approach that could matter for cash flow.
205.15%
Inventory growth of 205.15% while FURY is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate build that must match future sales to avoid risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
141.44%
Growth well above FURY's 100.15%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
-95.94%
Both negative yoy, with FURY at -249.11%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
47.95%
Operating cash flow growth at 50-75% of FURY's 68.70%. Martin Whitman would worry about lagging operational liquidity vs. competitor.
-20.19%
Negative yoy CapEx while FURY is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
We reduce yoy sales while FURY is 24.49%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
83.25%
Less 'other investing' outflow yoy vs. FURY's 175.18%. David Dodd would see a stronger short-term cash position unless competitor invests more wisely.
71.92%
We have mild expansions while FURY is negative at -110.90%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
98.75%
Debt repayment growth of 98.75% while FURY is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
-73.92%
Negative yoy issuance while FURY is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.