10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.61M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
1589.95%
Net income growth above 1.5x ITRG's 26.70%. David Dodd would see a clear bottom-line advantage if it is backed by stable operations.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
Deferred tax of 100.00% while ITRG is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a partial difference that can matter for future cash flow if large in magnitude.
-25.20%
Negative yoy SBC while ITRG is 0.73%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
-205.46%
Negative yoy working capital usage while ITRG is 148.53%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
-200.85%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with ITRG at -106813.18%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
33.68%
Inventory growth of 33.68% while ITRG is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate build that must match future sales to avoid risk.
214.57%
AP growth well above ITRG's 149.39%. Michael Burry would be concerned about potential late payments or short-term liquidity strain relative to competitor.
-100.39%
Both reduce yoy usage, with ITRG at -3.44%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
-67.42%
Both negative yoy, with ITRG at -555.35%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
15.60%
Operating cash flow growth at 50-75% of ITRG's 26.17%. Martin Whitman would worry about lagging operational liquidity vs. competitor.
-43.84%
Both yoy lines negative, with ITRG at -54.53%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-227.26%
Negative yoy purchasing while ITRG stands at 98.76%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
-193.06%
We reduce yoy sales while ITRG is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
-46.90%
Both yoy lines negative, with ITRG at -100.07%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
-75.04%
Both yoy lines negative, with ITRG at -111.61%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
99.06%
We repay more while ITRG is negative at -27.04%. John Neff notes advantage in lowering leverage if competitor is ramping up debt or repaying less.
-100.00%
Negative yoy issuance while ITRG is 21501.13%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.