PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.61M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
38.78%
Some net income increase while ITRG is negative at -23.33%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
-100.00%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with ITRG at -6.19%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
1018.81%
Deferred tax of 1018.81% while ITRG is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a partial difference that can matter for future cash flow if large in magnitude.
-56.56%
Negative yoy SBC while ITRG is 1.24%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
-139.17%
Negative yoy working capital usage while ITRG is 121.55%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
-108.31%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with ITRG at -321.44%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
-118.82%
Negative yoy inventory while ITRG is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
-232.42%
Negative yoy AP while ITRG is 145.54%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
141.65%
Growth well above ITRG's 106.18%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
32.17%
Well above ITRG's 45.29%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
51.11%
Operating cash flow growth above 1.5x ITRG's 24.62%. David Dodd would confirm superior cost control or stronger revenue-to-cash conversion.
7.01%
CapEx growth well above ITRG's 6.05%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-50.31%
Negative yoy purchasing while ITRG stands at 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
245.85%
We have some outflow growth while ITRG is negative at -99.84%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
41.89%
We have mild expansions while ITRG is negative at -108.30%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
-2953.68%
We cut debt repayment yoy while ITRG is 28.28%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
2461.51%
We slightly raise equity while ITRG is negative at -100.00%. John Neff sees competitor possibly preserving share count or buying back shares.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.