PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Orla Mining Ltd. (ORLA)
11.070.67 (6.44%)
10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.61M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-12.16%
Negative net income growth while ITRG stands at 0.23%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
13.08%
Deferred tax of 13.08% while ITRG is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a partial difference that can matter for future cash flow if large in magnitude.
-14.73%
Both cut yoy SBC, with ITRG at -6.52%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
117.07%
Slight usage while ITRG is negative at -66.90%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
-880.42%
AR is negative yoy while ITRG is 183.08%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
459.87%
Inventory growth of 459.87% while ITRG is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate build that must match future sales to avoid risk.
100.00%
A yoy AP increase while ITRG is negative at -121.72%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
-13.18%
Both reduce yoy usage, with ITRG at -80.78%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
-29.97%
Both negative yoy, with ITRG at -3.60%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
7.62%
Some CFO growth while ITRG is negative at -5.86%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-0.10%
Negative yoy CapEx while ITRG is 17.48%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
99.99%
Acquisition growth of 99.99% while ITRG is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
100.00%
Purchases growth of 100.00% while ITRG is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-91.33%
We reduce yoy other investing while ITRG is 62890.58%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-50.57%
We reduce yoy invests while ITRG stands at 1340.91%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
-103.34%
We cut debt repayment yoy while ITRG is 19.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
-100.00%
Negative yoy issuance while ITRG is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.