PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Orla Mining Ltd. (ORLA)
11.070.67 (6.44%)
10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.61M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-34.40%
Negative net income growth while THM stands at 38.11%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
2.73%
D&A growth of 2.73% while THM is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a mild cost difference that must be justified by expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-13.82%
Negative yoy SBC while THM is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
-268.70%
Both reduce yoy usage, with THM at -637.34%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
-40.48%
AR is negative yoy while THM is 15.55%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-94.98%
Both reduce yoy usage, with THM at -263.99%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
-188.16%
Both negative yoy, with THM at -262.12%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
-60.31%
Negative yoy CFO while THM is 55.60%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
-15.70%
Both yoy lines negative, with THM at -219495.21%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
6.54%
Growth of 6.54% while THM is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a moderate difference requiring justification by ROI in these smaller invests.
6.03%
We have mild expansions while THM is negative at -119.60%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
46.60%
Debt repayment growth of 46.60% while THM is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
1019.28%
Issuance growth of 1019.28% while THM is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild dilution that must be justified by expansions or acquisitions vs. competitor’s stable share base.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.