PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.61M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
91.68%
Some net income increase while THM is negative at -91.41%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
6.06%
Less D&A growth vs. THM's 1166.67%, reducing the hit to reported earnings. David Dodd would confirm that core assets remain sufficient.
-100.00%
Negative yoy deferred tax while THM stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
-49.34%
Negative yoy SBC while THM is 2304.24%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
230.67%
Well above THM's 0.24% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
148.95%
AR growth while THM is negative at -106.04%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
38.40%
Lower AP growth vs. THM's 100.00%, indicating prompt payments. David Dodd would confirm no lost opportunity in interest-free credit if expansions are underfunded.
-19.37%
Negative yoy usage while THM is 281.71%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
-1568.99%
Negative yoy while THM is 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
99.15%
Some CFO growth while THM is negative at -29.05%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
38.71%
CapEx growth of 38.71% while THM is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a mild cost burden that must yield returns in future revenue or margins.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
56.38%
Growth of 56.38% while THM is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a moderate difference requiring justification by ROI in these smaller invests.
41.64%
We expand invests by 41.64% while THM is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a moderate outflow that must be justified by returns vs. competitor’s stable approach.
-52.38%
We cut debt repayment yoy while THM is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.