10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.61M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-103.18%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with THM at -68.11%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
-100.00%
Negative yoy D&A while THM is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
-356.84%
Negative yoy deferred tax while THM stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
-35.96%
Negative yoy SBC while THM is 1190.52%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
53.18%
Well above THM's 0.81% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
115.31%
AR growth while THM is negative at -128.25%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
-197.73%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with THM at -100.00%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
-324.76%
Negative yoy AP while THM is 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
28.58%
Growth well above THM's 4.64%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
4190.20%
Growth of 4190.20% while THM is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might reflect intangible expansions or partial write-offs.
-2.72%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with THM at -14.29%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
81.46%
CapEx growth of 81.46% while THM is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a mild cost burden that must yield returns in future revenue or margins.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
309.89%
Growth of 309.89% while THM is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a moderate difference requiring justification by ROI in these smaller invests.
311.73%
We expand invests by 311.73% while THM is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a moderate outflow that must be justified by returns vs. competitor’s stable approach.
-8202.27%
We cut debt repayment yoy while THM is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.