PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Orla Mining Ltd. (ORLA)
11.070.67 (6.44%)
10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.61M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
110.12%
Some net income increase while THM is negative at -181.85%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
-100.00%
Negative yoy D&A while THM is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.54%
SBC growth while THM is negative at -2092.80%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
-965.20%
Both reduce yoy usage, with THM at -81.29%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
408.26%
AR growth well above THM's 194.62%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
144.37%
Inventory growth of 144.37% while THM is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate build that must match future sales to avoid risk.
76.31%
AP growth of 76.31% while THM is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might matter for short-term liquidity if expansions are large.
-131113.04%
Negative yoy usage while THM is 8.62%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
327.94%
Some yoy increase while THM is negative at -100.00%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
38.14%
Some CFO growth while THM is negative at -313.98%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-381.56%
Negative yoy CapEx while THM is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
100.00%
Acquisition growth of 100.00% while THM is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
202.09%
Purchases growth of 202.09% while THM is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
6873.76%
Liquidation growth of 6873.76% while THM is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
-381.98%
We reduce yoy other investing while THM is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-1020.15%
We reduce yoy invests while THM stands at 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
118288.35%
Debt repayment growth of 118288.35% while THM is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
Buyback growth of 100.00% while THM is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.