PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.61M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-3.08%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with THM at -191.52%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
-100.00%
Negative yoy D&A while THM is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
130.66%
Deferred tax of 130.66% while THM is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a partial difference that can matter for future cash flow if large in magnitude.
-27.19%
Negative yoy SBC while THM is 1184.07%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
118.30%
Well above THM's 0.30% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
19.06%
AR growth is negative or stable vs. THM's 63.97%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd would confirm it doesn't hamper sales volume.
36.01%
Inventory growth of 36.01% while THM is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate build that must match future sales to avoid risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
193.20%
Some yoy usage while THM is negative at -11.57%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
92.05%
Growth of 92.05% while THM is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might reflect intangible expansions or partial write-offs.
573.30%
Some CFO growth while THM is negative at -110.82%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-74.64%
Negative yoy CapEx while THM is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-102.09%
We reduce yoy other investing while THM is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-718.24%
We reduce yoy invests while THM stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
-1.86%
We cut debt repayment yoy while THM is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
521.04%
Issuance growth of 521.04% while THM is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild dilution that must be justified by expansions or acquisitions vs. competitor’s stable share base.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.