PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Orla Mining Ltd. (ORLA)
11.070.67 (6.44%)
10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.61M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
38.78%
Some net income increase while THM is negative at -162.53%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
-100.00%
Negative yoy D&A while THM is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
1018.81%
Deferred tax of 1018.81% while THM is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a partial difference that can matter for future cash flow if large in magnitude.
-56.56%
Negative yoy SBC while THM is 2047.07%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
-139.17%
Both reduce yoy usage, with THM at -248.28%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
-108.31%
AR is negative yoy while THM is 163.24%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
-118.82%
Negative yoy inventory while THM is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
-232.42%
Negative yoy AP while THM is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
141.65%
Some yoy usage while THM is negative at -221.96%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
32.17%
Growth of 32.17% while THM is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might reflect intangible expansions or partial write-offs.
51.11%
Some CFO growth while THM is negative at -163.32%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
7.01%
CapEx growth of 7.01% while THM is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a mild cost burden that must yield returns in future revenue or margins.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-50.31%
Negative yoy purchasing while THM stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
245.85%
Growth well above THM's 100.00%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier intangible or side spending overshadowing competitor’s approach, risking short-term FCF.
41.89%
Lower net investing outflow yoy vs. THM's 198.54%, preserving short-term cash. David Dodd would confirm expansions remain sufficient.
-2953.68%
We cut debt repayment yoy while THM is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
2461.51%
We slightly raise equity while THM is negative at -102.24%. John Neff sees competitor possibly preserving share count or buying back shares.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.