PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Orla Mining Ltd. (ORLA)
11.070.67 (6.44%)
10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.61M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-9.92%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-1.52%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-10.21%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-2.62%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-2.62%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
13.35%
Share count expansion well above CGAU's 0.06%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
13.35%
Slight or no buyback while CGAU is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
16.78%
Positive OCF growth while CGAU is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
-144.35%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-482.18%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while CGAU is at 86.84%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
-482.18%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while CGAU is 86.84%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-482.18%
Negative 3Y CAGR while CGAU is 51.93%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
-40.18%
Negative equity/share CAGR over 10 years while CGAU stands at 59.47%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental red flag unless the competitor also struggles.
-40.18%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while CGAU is at 59.47%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
-40.18%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while CGAU is at 39.40%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
85.79%
Our AR growth while CGAU is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-17.27%
Negative asset growth while CGAU invests at 1.70%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
-28.20%
We have a declining book value while CGAU shows 2.89%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.56%
We expand SG&A while CGAU cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.