PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Orla Mining Ltd. (ORLA)
11.070.67 (6.44%)
10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.61M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
36.75%
Positive EBIT growth while CGAU is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
36.74%
Positive operating income growth while CGAU is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
8.91%
Positive net income growth while CGAU is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
8.85%
Positive EPS growth while CGAU is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
8.85%
Positive diluted EPS growth while CGAU is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
0.24%
Share count expansion well above CGAU's 0.06%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
0.24%
Diluted share count expanding well above CGAU's 0.03%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-17.14%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-31.28%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-89.52%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while CGAU stands at 960.13%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
-17.36%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while CGAU is at 330.45%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
-17.36%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while CGAU is 124.81%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
3.21%
Below 50% of CGAU's 15.89%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
-27.56%
Negative equity/share CAGR over 10 years while CGAU stands at 96.90%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental red flag unless the competitor also struggles.
-27.56%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while CGAU is at 81.73%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
-49.70%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while CGAU is at 77.01%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
110.19%
Our AR growth while CGAU is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-7.44%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
1.36%
Positive BV/share change while CGAU is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-36.74%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.