PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Orla Mining Ltd. (ORLA)
11.070.67 (6.44%)
10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.61M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-20.74%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-20.74%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-20.74%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-19.35%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-19.35%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
52.40%
Positive OCF growth while CGAU is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
127.62%
Positive FCF growth while CGAU is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
84.97%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while CGAU is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
92.55%
Positive OCF/share growth while CGAU is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
91.37%
3Y OCF/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x CGAU's 65.50%. Bruce Berkowitz might see if strategic cost controls or product mix drove recent gains.
-64.44%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
68.74%
Positive 5Y CAGR while CGAU is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
62.99%
Positive short-term CAGR while CGAU is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
-48.46%
Negative equity/share CAGR over 10 years while CGAU stands at 97.52%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental red flag unless the competitor also struggles.
-58.90%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while CGAU is at 73.80%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
-6.03%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while CGAU is at 22.94%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
42.13%
AR growth well above CGAU's 58.07%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.59%
Positive asset growth while CGAU is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
-0.90%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
20.73%
SG&A growth well above CGAU's 12.44%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.