PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Orla Mining Ltd. (ORLA)
11.070.67 (6.44%)
10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.61M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
170.79%
EBIT growth above 1.5x CGAU's 96.52%. David Dodd would confirm if core operations or niche positioning yield superior profitability.
-120.49%
Negative operating income growth while CGAU is at 96.52%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
45.92%
Net income growth at 50-75% of CGAU's 90.02%. Martin Whitman would question fundamental disadvantages in expenses or demand.
46.77%
EPS growth at 50-75% of CGAU's 89.69%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lag in operational efficiency or a higher share count.
46.77%
Diluted EPS growth at 50-75% of CGAU's 89.69%. Martin Whitman would question if share issuance or modest net income gains hamper progress.
13.36%
Share count expansion well above CGAU's 0.00%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
13.36%
Diluted share count expanding well above CGAU's 0.12%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
251.77%
Positive OCF growth while CGAU is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
185.36%
Positive FCF growth while CGAU is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
146.93%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while CGAU is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
111.10%
Positive OCF/share growth while CGAU is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
-40.49%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
34.31%
Positive 10Y CAGR while CGAU is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
96.30%
Positive 5Y CAGR while CGAU is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
56.49%
Positive short-term CAGR while CGAU is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
-83.26%
Negative equity/share CAGR over 10 years while CGAU stands at 103.48%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental red flag unless the competitor also struggles.
-83.13%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while CGAU is at 73.45%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
-77.98%
Both show negative short-term equity/share CAGR. Martin Whitman suspects an industry slump or unprofitable expansions for both players.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Firm’s AR is declining while CGAU shows 183.51%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
-100.00%
Inventory is declining while CGAU stands at 10.02%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
-10.32%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
10.55%
Positive BV/share change while CGAU is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-170.79%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.