10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.61M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
47.15%
Positive EBIT growth while CGAU is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
56.38%
Positive operating income growth while CGAU is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
-157.71%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
114.10%
Share count expansion well above CGAU's 0.03%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
114.10%
Slight or no buyback while CGAU is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
56.78%
Positive OCF growth while CGAU is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
56.78%
Positive FCF growth while CGAU is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
96.25%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x CGAU's 48.88%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
71.47%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of CGAU's 353.73%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
93.74%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x CGAU's 32.41% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
98.92%
Positive 5Y CAGR while CGAU is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
96.62%
3Y net income/share CAGR 50-75% of CGAU's 140.13%. Martin Whitman might see a lagging edge in short-term profitability vs. the competitor.
-89.89%
Negative equity/share CAGR over 10 years while CGAU stands at 107.32%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental red flag unless the competitor also struggles.
-83.11%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while CGAU is at 30.01%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
-85.29%
Both show negative short-term equity/share CAGR. Martin Whitman suspects an industry slump or unprofitable expansions for both players.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-62.71%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.38%
Negative asset growth while CGAU invests at 1.13%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
-52.86%
We have a declining book value while CGAU shows 1.05%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-47.15%
We cut SG&A while CGAU invests at 8.03%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.