PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Orla Mining Ltd. (ORLA)
11.070.67 (6.44%)
10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.61M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-289.55%
Negative EBIT growth while CGAU is at 74.65%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-289.55%
Negative operating income growth while CGAU is at 74.65%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-72.32%
Negative net income growth while CGAU stands at 84.10%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-75.00%
Negative EPS growth while CGAU is at 84.31%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-75.00%
Negative diluted EPS growth while CGAU is at 84.27%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
-0.63%
Share reduction while CGAU is at 1.33%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-571.76%
Negative OCF growth while CGAU is at 15.79%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-397.57%
Negative FCF growth while CGAU is at 155.29%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
84.24%
10Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of CGAU's 790.75%. Michael Burry would worry about a persistent underperformance in cash creation.
87.21%
Positive OCF/share growth while CGAU is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
-174.49%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
96.83%
Positive 10Y CAGR while CGAU is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
71.57%
Positive 5Y CAGR while CGAU is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
-92.44%
Negative 3Y CAGR while CGAU is 95.83%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
-98.24%
Negative equity/share CAGR over 10 years while CGAU stands at 99.14%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental red flag unless the competitor also struggles.
-92.26%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while CGAU is at 10.16%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
-80.46%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while CGAU is at 5.46%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-7.61%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
-9.52%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
289.27%
SG&A growth well above CGAU's 16.17%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.