PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Orla Mining Ltd. (ORLA)
11.070.67 (6.44%)
10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.61M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
93.98%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x CGAU's 54.44%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
-315.21%
Negative EBIT growth while CGAU is at 161.97%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-97.02%
Negative operating income growth while CGAU is at 161.97%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-246.36%
Negative net income growth while CGAU stands at 154.81%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-242.86%
Negative EPS growth while CGAU is at 159.26%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-242.86%
Negative diluted EPS growth while CGAU is at 151.85%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
1.38%
Share count expansion well above CGAU's 0.43%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
1.38%
Diluted share count expanding well above CGAU's 1.54%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-848.72%
Negative OCF growth while CGAU is at 33.86%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-29.48%
Negative FCF growth while CGAU is at 66.23%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
11.17%
10Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of CGAU's 1268.60%. Michael Burry would worry about a persistent underperformance in cash creation.
-9768.63%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while CGAU is at 599.89%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
-160.70%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while CGAU stands at 196.23%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
-67.17%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while CGAU is at 868.18%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
-731.94%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while CGAU is 1010.56%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-133.30%
Negative 3Y CAGR while CGAU is 24225.18%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
165.49%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x CGAU's 69.47%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
1703.99%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x CGAU's 33.32%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
-10.77%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while CGAU is at 22.90%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
140.85%
Our AR growth while CGAU is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.36%
Negative asset growth while CGAU invests at 8.03%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
-2.16%
We have a declining book value while CGAU shows 9.70%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
-1.09%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3.90%
We expand SG&A while CGAU cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.