PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Orla Mining Ltd. (ORLA)
11.070.67 (6.44%)
10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.61M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-56.52%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-5.32%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-6.92%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
0.08%
Positive net income growth while CGAU is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.70%
Share count expansion well above CGAU's 0.21%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
0.70%
Slight or no buyback while CGAU is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
61.34%
Positive OCF growth while CGAU is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
-97.04%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
28.31%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x CGAU's 5.78%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
-460.51%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while CGAU is at 209.96%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
-292.15%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while CGAU stands at 5.28%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
-35.33%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
-376.05%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while CGAU is 2780.49%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-91.88%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
54.61%
10Y equity/share CAGR in line with CGAU's 54.81%. Walter Schloss might see both benefiting from stable profitability and moderate payout ratios over the decade.
1898.00%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x CGAU's 40.53%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
-34.44%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while CGAU is at 20.02%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
19.30%
AR growth is negative/stable vs. CGAU's 40.72%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd confirms it doesn't hamper actual sales.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
28.38%
Asset growth above 1.5x CGAU's 4.82%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
0.21%
Under 50% of CGAU's 3.82%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
226.19%
We have some new debt while CGAU reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-98.29%
We cut SG&A while CGAU invests at 75.24%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.