PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Orla Mining Ltd. (ORLA)
11.070.67 (6.44%)
10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.61M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
8.33%
Positive gross profit growth while CGAU is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
-63.34%
Negative EBIT growth while CGAU is at 13.15%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-32.04%
Negative operating income growth while CGAU is at 13.15%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-41.36%
Negative net income growth while CGAU stands at 75.85%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-48.81%
Negative EPS growth while CGAU is at 78.12%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-37.50%
Negative diluted EPS growth while CGAU is at 71.88%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
-5.66%
Share reduction while CGAU is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
2.14%
Diluted share change of 2.14% while CGAU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor difference that could widen over time.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-93.50%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-45.89%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.57%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while CGAU is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
-331.24%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while CGAU is at 1215.39%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
4.45%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of CGAU's 480.00%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
-342.39%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
-550.48%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while CGAU is 650.71%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-66.03%
Negative 3Y CAGR while CGAU is 1724.77%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
136.00%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x CGAU's 49.48%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
2137.12%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x CGAU's 46.33%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
-19.25%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while CGAU is at 26.74%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-63.24%
Firm’s AR is declining while CGAU shows 60.92%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
20.72%
Asset growth above 1.5x CGAU's 6.12%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
8.82%
1.25-1.5x CGAU's 6.41%. Bruce Berkowitz sees if the firm's capital management strategies surpass the competitor's approach.
54.31%
We have some new debt while CGAU reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
8621.88%
We expand SG&A while CGAU cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.