PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Orla Mining Ltd. (ORLA)
11.070.67 (6.44%)
10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.61M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-6.06%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
91.49%
Positive EBIT growth while CGAU is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
100.00%
Positive operating income growth while CGAU is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
91.68%
Positive net income growth while CGAU is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
92.40%
Positive EPS growth while CGAU is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
91.77%
Positive diluted EPS growth while CGAU is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
9.98%
Share count expansion well above CGAU's 0.23%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
1.58%
Slight or no buyback while CGAU is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
99.15%
Positive OCF growth while CGAU is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
45.00%
FCF growth similar to CGAU's 49.64%. Walter Schloss would attribute it to parallel capital spending and operational models.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
99.34%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while CGAU is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
96.36%
5Y OCF/share CAGR is similar to CGAU's 95.88%. Walter Schloss might see parallel cost profiles or expansions producing comparable cash flow.
99.25%
3Y OCF/share CAGR similar to CGAU's 98.72%. Walter Schloss might see both benefiting from a rising tide or parallel expansions.
63.17%
Positive 10Y CAGR while CGAU is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
50.93%
Positive 5Y CAGR while CGAU is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
86.15%
Positive short-term CAGR while CGAU is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
114.01%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x CGAU's 2.14%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
2306.49%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while CGAU is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
-38.56%
Both show negative short-term equity/share CAGR. Martin Whitman suspects an industry slump or unprofitable expansions for both players.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
94.67%
Our AR growth while CGAU is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
20.06%
Positive asset growth while CGAU is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
-8.08%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
46.92%
We have some new debt while CGAU reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-14.94%
We cut SG&A while CGAU invests at 9.92%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.