10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.61M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-48.57%
Negative gross profit growth while CGAU is at 5.52%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-914.93%
Negative EBIT growth while CGAU is at 50.71%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-962.74%
Negative net income growth while CGAU stands at 103.24%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-952.63%
Negative EPS growth while CGAU is at 103.14%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-921.05%
Negative diluted EPS growth while CGAU is at 103.14%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
0.48%
Share count expansion well above CGAU's 0.04%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
3.48%
Diluted share count expanding well above CGAU's 1.23%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-7172.50%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-2.35%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-186.47%
Both show negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking or too capital-intensive.
-175.14%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
66.44%
3Y OCF/share CAGR similar to CGAU's 63.31%. Walter Schloss might see both benefiting from a rising tide or parallel expansions.
-485.18%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
-562.41%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-10.65%
Negative 3Y CAGR while CGAU is 352.83%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
116.39%
Positive growth while CGAU is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
357.67%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while CGAU is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
-30.23%
Both show negative short-term equity/share CAGR. Martin Whitman suspects an industry slump or unprofitable expansions for both players.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
6.85%
Our AR growth while CGAU is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
7.21%
Asset growth above 1.5x CGAU's 0.49%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
12.74%
BV/share growth above 1.5x CGAU's 1.16%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
0.78%
Debt shrinking faster vs. CGAU's 8.99%. David Dodd sees a safer balance sheet if it doesn't impair future growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-13.02%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.