10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.61M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
2.58%
Revenue growth under 50% of CGAU's 6.78%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
-0.29%
Negative gross profit growth while CGAU is at 5226.89%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
55.73%
Positive EBIT growth while CGAU is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
-39.93%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
1589.95%
Positive net income growth while CGAU is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
1412.50%
Positive EPS growth while CGAU is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
1350.00%
Positive diluted EPS growth while CGAU is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
11.52%
Slight or no buybacks while CGAU is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
17.15%
Slight or no buyback while CGAU is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
15.60%
Positive OCF growth while CGAU is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
13.76%
Positive FCF growth while CGAU is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4703886.36%
Positive 3Y CAGR while CGAU is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
837.52%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x CGAU's 35.85%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
869.30%
Positive OCF/share growth while CGAU is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
380.28%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while CGAU is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
450.21%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x CGAU's 30.35% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
318.45%
Positive 5Y CAGR while CGAU is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
207.56%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x CGAU's 75.52%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
322.21%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x CGAU's 34.16%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
69.00%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x CGAU's 22.17%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
106.51%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x CGAU's 12.70%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-53.52%
Firm’s AR is declining while CGAU shows 12.62%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
18.51%
Inventory growth well above CGAU's 0.72%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
41.95%
Positive asset growth while CGAU is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
54.35%
BV/share growth above 1.5x CGAU's 12.00%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
-2.60%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-16.50%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.