10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.61M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
1.72%
Revenue growth under 50% of CGAU's 86.37%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
-6.23%
Negative gross profit growth while CGAU is at 1396.08%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-19.86%
Negative EBIT growth while CGAU is at 419.61%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-6.23%
Negative operating income growth while CGAU is at 419.61%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-58.14%
Negative net income growth while CGAU stands at 252.77%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-57.75%
Negative EPS growth while CGAU is at 255.56%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-59.49%
Negative diluted EPS growth while CGAU is at 250.00%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
-2.14%
Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.
0.64%
Diluted share count expanding well above CGAU's 0.18%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
7.40%
OCF growth under 50% of CGAU's 398.87%. Michael Burry might suspect questionable revenue recognition or rising costs.
0.53%
FCF growth under 50% of CGAU's 1262.00%. Michael Burry would suspect weaker operating efficiencies or heavier capex burdens.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3068.75%
10Y OCF/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x CGAU's 2246.35%. Bruce Berkowitz would confirm if the firm's long-term capital allocation yields better cash returns.
319.68%
5Y OCF/share CAGR at 50-75% of CGAU's 498.26%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm lags in monetizing revenue effectively.
388.38%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while CGAU is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
329.83%
Below 50% of CGAU's 3819.23%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
147.34%
Below 50% of CGAU's 1265.26%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
150.89%
Positive short-term CAGR while CGAU is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
487.89%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x CGAU's 36.07%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
28.48%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x CGAU's 9.94%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
108.08%
Positive short-term equity growth while CGAU is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-8.84%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
5.83%
We show growth while CGAU is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
2.68%
Asset growth 1.25-1.5x CGAU's 2.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees if the firm's investments effectively outpace the competitor in future returns.
3.76%
1.25-1.5x CGAU's 3.37%. Bruce Berkowitz sees if the firm's capital management strategies surpass the competitor's approach.
20.36%
Debt growth far above CGAU's 8.19%. Michael Burry fears the firm is taking on undue leverage vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-3.42%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.