PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Orla Mining Ltd. (ORLA)
11.070.67 (6.44%)
10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.61M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
4.40%
Revenue growth above 1.5x CGAU's 0.43%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
3.99%
Gross profit growth at 75-90% of CGAU's 4.75%. Bill Ackman would demand operational improvements to match competitor gains.
-335.97%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-37.40%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-1188.31%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-1224.26%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-1287.50%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
0.22%
Slight or no buybacks while CGAU is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
-5.12%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-12.45%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-19.23%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1396.49%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while CGAU is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
175.98%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x CGAU's 32.02%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
756.08%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x CGAU's 11.42%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
-18.94%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
-95.03%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-456.88%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
1373.63%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x CGAU's 23.93%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
74.79%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x CGAU's 5.15%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
81.70%
Positive short-term equity growth while CGAU is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-92.97%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
2.55%
We show growth while CGAU is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
-17.28%
Negative asset growth while CGAU invests at 5.22%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
-12.49%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
-34.48%
We’re deleveraging while CGAU stands at 371.04%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
20.80%
SG&A declining or stable vs. CGAU's 92.15%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.